David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality
The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.
At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!
Most recent
Press Release – Never Abandoning the Fight for Ethical Care
23 June 2025
The Anscombe Centre’s Statement after the Commons Third Reading of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of...
Press Release – Politeia Publishes Paper by Anscombe Centre Director Outlining Dangers of Assisted Dying Bill Ahead of Key Vote
18 June 2025
Ahead of the Third Reading vote on Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide Bill on Friday, think-tank Poli...
Press Statement – Anscombe Bioethics Centre Strongly Opposes Harmful and Inhumane Abortion ‘Decriminalisation’ Amendments
17 June 2025
Our Press Statement on two amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill which would aim to ‘decriminali...
Support Us
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.