Press Statement – The Alta Fixsler Case: Subsidiarity and the Importance of Circumstances

Press Statement – Alta Fixsler: Subsidiarity and the Importance of Circumstances

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre has released a statement commenting on the ethical aspects of the Alta Fixsler case. The case involves a dispute between the parents of a seriously ill child and the healthcare team over the withdrawal of treatment and has gone before the court.

Reiterating the Centre’s position on previous similar cases, David Albert Jones, Director of the Anscombe Centre, said: ‘One fundamental problem in these cases is the idea that there can be only one option that is in the child’s best interests because “there can only logically be one best option”. The judge therefore seeks to identify what is best for the child independently of the wishes of the parents. However, this approach rests on the mistaken utilitarian idea that moral reasoning is a matter of mathematical calculation. [...] There are many ways to live that are morally upright and many decisions a parent may make on behalf of a child that are within reason. The question that judges should ask is not, “What would I do if I were the parent of this child?”, but, “Is the decision of parents in this case reasonable, or does it place the child in undue danger of suffering harm?”’.

Prof. Jones also noted: ‘It is extraordinary that, in the overwhelming majority of such cases, decisions are reached by consensus between parents and healthcare professionals. Only very rarely do such cases lead to conflict that is irresolvable and that ends up in court. When this happens, it is important that courts do not take the decision away from parents except in cases where the decision of the parents would lead to the child suffering significant harm. Whether such action by a court is justified in a particular case depends crucially on the circumstances. Furthermore, even when such action by the court is justified, the inability of doctors and parents to find a common mind still represents a failure of communication and a breakdown of trust. Taking the decision away from the parents cannot but add to their grief’.

For more information on this issue, read the full statement.

Most recent

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – Anscombe Centre Shines Light on Equality and Suicide Prevention Concerns Regarding ‘Assisted Dying’ Bill Ahead of Key Vote

04 June 2025

Ahead of the votes on Report Stage (continuing on 13 June 2025) and Third Reading (possibly 20 June ...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – Anscombe Centre Publishes Analysis of a Sinister Document About a Sinister Bill

23 May 2025

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre has published an analysis of the Government’s Impact Assessment of the...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Statement – Hospices to be Forced to Provide Assisted Suicide

19 May 2025

The Anscombe Centre’s statement on the rejection of an amendment to Kim Leadbeater MP’s ‘assisted dy...

Support Us

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.

FIND OUT MORE MAKE A DONATION