Press Statement – The Alta Fixsler Case: Subsidiarity and the Importance of Circumstances

Press Statement – Alta Fixsler: Subsidiarity and the Importance of Circumstances

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre has released a statement commenting on the ethical aspects of the Alta Fixsler case. The case involves a dispute between the parents of a seriously ill child and the healthcare team over the withdrawal of treatment and has gone before the court.

Reiterating the Centre’s position on previous similar cases, David Albert Jones, Director of the Anscombe Centre, said: ‘One fundamental problem in these cases is the idea that there can be only one option that is in the child’s best interests because “there can only logically be one best option”. The judge therefore seeks to identify what is best for the child independently of the wishes of the parents. However, this approach rests on the mistaken utilitarian idea that moral reasoning is a matter of mathematical calculation. [...] There are many ways to live that are morally upright and many decisions a parent may make on behalf of a child that are within reason. The question that judges should ask is not, “What would I do if I were the parent of this child?”, but, “Is the decision of parents in this case reasonable, or does it place the child in undue danger of suffering harm?”’.

Prof. Jones also noted: ‘It is extraordinary that, in the overwhelming majority of such cases, decisions are reached by consensus between parents and healthcare professionals. Only very rarely do such cases lead to conflict that is irresolvable and that ends up in court. When this happens, it is important that courts do not take the decision away from parents except in cases where the decision of the parents would lead to the child suffering significant harm. Whether such action by a court is justified in a particular case depends crucially on the circumstances. Furthermore, even when such action by the court is justified, the inability of doctors and parents to find a common mind still represents a failure of communication and a breakdown of trust. Taking the decision away from the parents cannot but add to their grief’.

For more information on this issue, read the full statement.

Most recent

End of Life Care

Anscombe Statement – Another Child Denied the Right to Travel for Medical Treatment

13 November 2023

The Centre prepared a Statement on the ethics of the case of Indi Gregory, whose life-supporting car...

Assisted Reproduction

‘Making Babies in the Lab: The Morality of Reproductive Technologies’: Dr Mehmet Çiftçi

28 October 2023

Here is the opening statement by our Public Bioethics Fellow, Dr Mehmet Çiftçi, in a recent debate a...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release: 27 Years After Implementation, Anscombe Centre Raises Worrying Trends in Oregon’s Assisted Suicide System

27 October 2023

Today marks 27 years since the implementation of Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act in 1998. In that ti...

Support Us

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.